Archive for the ‘Ancient Rome’ Category



Agrippina the Elder- Enemy of the State or First Lady of Roman Politics?

By: The Scribe on March, 2011

Although many people tend to concentrate on the men in Roman politics, the women also had an important role to play in many cases. One example of this is Agrippina the Elder, who lived from 14 BCE to 33 CE. She was the granddaughter of Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus, who was emperor of Rome from 27 BCE to 14 CE. Her links to the Caesars of Rome did not end with Augustus, however.

A bust of Agrippina the ElderAgrippina was married to Germanicus, a general in the armies of the Roman Empire. She was also his maternal second cousin. She bore him nine children, although only six lived past childhood. Two of the best known would have to be her son Caligula, who later went on to rule the Empire, and her daughter, the Empress Agrippina the Younger. Many of her children still had important roles to play in the political life of Rome.

Her husband was a popular military leader and was adored by the common citizens in Rome. While Augustus was in power, everything looked good for Agrippina and her husband. She accompanied him on his military campaigns, which was something quite unusual for the time. It was far more normal for a Roman wife to stay at home with the children while her husband was off on campaign. This was something that earned her a reputation for being a very devoted and heroic wife. She also earned the reputation for being a skilled diplomat as well.

Because her husband was a favorite of Augustus, Germanicus was even considered by Augustus as the heir to the empire. If that had taken place, things would likely have turned out very differently for Agrippina. Unfortunately, her husband was passed over for the position and Tiberius was made Emperor instead of Germanicus.

Her husband died during a trip to the Middle East in 19 CE. Agrippina accused Gnaeus Calpurnius Piso, the man who was then governor of Syria, of poisoning her husband and returned to Italy with his ashes. She continued to be active in the political life of Rome and, over time, Tiberius began to suspect her of disloyalty to him. She was arrested, along with two of her sons, in 29 CE and was banished to the island of Pandataria, which is now known as Ventotene. There, she was flogged by a centurion and lost an eye in the process.

Agrippina eventually starved herself to death in 33 CE. Of her three sons, Drusus also died of starvation while imprisoned, and her son Nero died after his trial in 29 CE. Reports state that he was either murdered or that he committed suicide. Caligula, her remaining son, succeeded Tiberius as emperor of Rome. A cinerary urn for Agrippina the Elder

Although Tiberius tried to slander her name and reputation, he did not succeed. She was known for many positive things such as her courage and her devotion to her husband and her children. She also made it far more easy for women to wield power in Roman politics and showed them that women could indeed have a role in making policies that helped to shape the Roman Empire as a whole.



Roman Houses were full of Spirits Not All of Which came from Grapes

By: The Scribe on March, 2011

Romans often had a very busy religious life. There were many different religious festivals and rites that needed to be observed for well known Roman gods including Vesta, Jupiter and Juno but other than the religious ceremonies, these deities didn’t have much control over the daily lives of regular citizens. That was the responsibility of a collection of different spirits that were believed to reside in and around the home of Roman citizens. It was believed that these invisible spirits had a huge role to play in how harmonious, prosperous and peaceful a Roman home was and that if the spirits were not appeased, things could go very badly indeed.An illustration from a 4th century manuscript

If a Roman wanted to ensure that they would have enough food in the house, they didn’t go to Juno or Vesta. Instead, a Roman would pray to Panes or Penates. These were earth spirits who also held sway over the pantry and kitchen of a Roman home. They were represented by statuettes that were prayed to daily and which were set out on a table during a meal.

There were several different names for the spirits of dead ancestors. Ancestor worship was a huge part of Roman religious life. When someone’s mother or father died, it was believed that they became one of the Parentes, which were spirits of immediate family members. Parentes could also be the spirits of close relatives who were still living. They were represented by statuettes and it was not unusual for a Roman to take the statuettes of living relatives with them. The statuettes of living relatives were accompanied by fire from a Roman’s own hearth.

A statuette believed to hold a Lar or guardian spiritThe spirits of dead ancestors were believed to live in statuettes as well but these were known as Lares. A Roman family was expected to pray to them daily and make offerings to them at different times during the year. Significant dates such as anniversaries, weddings and birthdays were celebrated by more elaborate rituals.

Moving permanently from one household to another meant that the statuettes which represented the Lares and Panes would also be moved by the family. It was very important to Romans that the spirits were prayed to and worshipped properly. It was believed that if a spirit was not shown the proper respect or if a family forgot to pray to it, it could become wrathful or mischievous. Spirits who became unhappy were known as Lemures. Since the Romans believed that the world around them was full of spirits it was not unusual that they would think some were wrathful or out to do harm to the living.

Romans referred to the spirits of the deceased as Manes. The Manes were worshipped during a festival known as Parentalia. During the festival, sacrifices were made to the Manes. The sacrifices (which usually took the form of flower garlands, wine-soaked bread, wheat and salt) were placed at family tombs and the celebration was considered to be a positive one. However, the evil spirits were also addressed during Feralia, a celebration that marked the end of Parentalia. It was believed that unless Feralia took place, the spirits of the dead would rise from their graves and roam the streets.



Publius Afranius Potitus- The Man Who Gave His Life So Caligula Would Live

By: The Scribe on February, 2011

Many ancient rulers were revered as gods by their people and had those people pray for their safety or health during times of trouble or sickness. It was not uncommon for ancient peoples to vow to give their lives or sacrifice animals or other items to the gods in order to ensure that their rulers would recover from illness or injury. When the ruler recovered life would continue as normal. It was rare that any individual was taken up on their promise of self-sacrifice. A colored marble bust of Caligula

It pays to be careful who you are making the vows for and who you tell about your willingness to sacrifice yourself. Sometimes, just sometimes, the odd ruler will take you up on your promise. A Roman plebian by the name of Publius Afranius Potitus had made no secret of the fact that he would be willing to give his life if the Emperor Caligula were to recover from an illness. Caligula had been in power for a mere six months at that time and was still a popular ruler because of the extravagant shows that he put on for the entertainment of the Roman people. Caligula recovered from his illness and, instead of rewarding Afranius for his loyalty, gave the man what he wished. Afranius was executed. Some accounts state that Caligula had Afranius dressed as a sacrificial animal before he was sacrificed.

Afranius was what is known as a devotio. Becoming a devotio was a Roman tradition in which a person would dedicate themselves to the gods of the Underworld. In later days, the term was also used to describe someone who was willing to sacrifice themselves for the health and well-being of the emperor. As Caligula wanted to be worshipped as a living god, he likely felt that this vow was a most welcome one.

Perhaps it would have been better if Afranius had never made his vow. Caligula is widely regarded as one of the cruelest of the Roman Emperors. He was a big spender who rapidly emptied the Roman treasury of the money his predecessor Tiberius had saved. He used that money to throw lavish feasts and public spectacles.

Caligula was perhaps best known for his sexual excesses. Two sources, Philo of Alexandria and Seneca the Younger both painted Caligula as being insane. He was known for throwing lavish feasts at which he bedded his guests’ wives. He was rumored to have carried on incestuous relationships with his sisters Agrippina the Younger, Livilla and DrusillaA cryptoporticus built during the reign of Nero.

Caligula’s reign did not end well. He was particularly disliked by the Senate, the equestrian order and the Roman nobility. He was stabbed 30 times by a group of men led by Cassius Chaerea, an officer who was part of the Praetorian Guard. The attack took place in a cryptoporticus or underground corridor. The location made it difficult for the Germanic Guard, which was loyal to Caligula, to arrive until after the deed had been done.

Perhaps Caligula wished that he had let Afranius live after all.



The Great Fire of… Rome?

By: The Scribe on January, 2011

It is likely that many people have heard of the Great Fire of London which swept through the city in 1666 and which burned for four days. Rome also suffered a devastating fire that burned through the city for five and a half days in 64 CE. Like the Great Fire of London, this blaze consumed much of the city of Rome. This was the blaze that earned Nero his nefarious, but untrue reputation. Although he was believed to have been responsible for the fire he would not have been able to fiddle while the city burned, since it took another thousand years for the instrument to be invented.

A bust of the Roman Emperor NeroNero was not a popular Emperor, so it is no wonder that he is held at least partly to blame for the blaze. Nero ruled Rome from 54 to 68 CE. He was known for two main things: his focus on diplomacy and his persecution of Christians. He was also known for executing his mother and stepbrother and as a ruler who was extremely extravagant. It was no wonder that an angry population blamed him for the fire even though he was, according to the accounts of the historian Tacitus, away in Antium at the time that the fire broke out.

The fire destroyed a massive portion of the city and left many people homeless. The city at the time was divided up into fourteen separate districts. Of these, three were completely destroyed by the fire. Seven others were damaged and four were left untouched. When the blaze came under control almost a week after it began, a tenth of the city had been burned by the fire.

This left a large number of people homeless. When Nero returned to the city, he opened up his own residence in order to provide shelter to people who had been burned out of their homes. As the supply of food was also an issue, Nero paid to have food delivered as well.Part of the interior of the Domus Aurea

The city was rebuilt. One new structure was the Domus Aurea, a new palace complex. Some rumors hinted that Nero had actually arranged for the city to burn just so that he could build his majestic new residence but that theory is debated simply because the fire started some distance away from where the palace was built.

One other theory was that Christians had started the blaze. At that time, they were not welcome in Rome and were subjected to horrific treatment at the hands of Nero. Some were thrown to dogs as a way of torturing them for their beliefs. There were also accounts of Christians being set ablaze and used as lighting for some areas at night. Although some Christians did confess to starting the Great Fire of Rome it is suspected that they only did so after being tortured so that they could serve as scapegoats.

Although this was one of the largest fires that Rome experienced there were several others that are worth noting. The fires took place first in 69 CE, during the reign of the Emperor Vitellius and again in 80 CE during the reign of the Emperor Titus.



Previous page | Next page