<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ancient History Blog &#187; Ancient World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ancientstandard.com/category/ancient-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ancientstandard.com</link>
	<description>Ancient History That Doesn&#039;t Suck</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:10:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gene for Red Hair may be older than you think</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/08/08/gene-for-red-hair-may-be-older-than-you-think/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/08/08/gene-for-red-hair-may-be-older-than-you-think/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/08/08/gene-for-red-hair-may-be-older-than-you-think/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists are now finding research that the gene responsible for red hair and freckles may have actually come from Neanderthal man. It is believed that the gene could be as much as 100,000 years old and was found in Neanderthals living in Europe. They believe that the gene was passed to our Homo sapiens ancestors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists are now finding research that the gene responsible for red hair and freckles may have actually come from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neanderthal">Neanderthal</a> man. It is believed that the gene could be as much as 100,000 years old and was found in Neanderthals living in Europe. They believe that the gene was passed to our <i>Homo sapiens</i> ancestors about 40,000 years ago. That was when our ancestors migrated to the area from Africa.<a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/image.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="A Neanderthal skull" border="0" alt="image" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/image_thumb.png" width="192" height="244" /></a></p>
<p>Neanderthals were taller than members of the <i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human">Homo sapiens</a></i> species and had much stockier builds. Their faces were larger than those of <i>Homo sapiens</i> ancestors and had large noses and chins and foreheads that receded. </p>
<p>Our ancestors, who belonged to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cro-Magnon">Cro-Magnon</a> branch of <i>Homo sapiens</i>, were able to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cro-Magnon_interaction_with_Neanderthals">co-exist</a> with Neanderthals for about 10,000 years. It is believed that the two species may have interbred in order for the gene to pass from one species to the next. It is the MC1R gene that is responsible for red hair and freckles. It is believed that Neanderthals that possessed the MC1R gene may actually have looked very similar to that of modern Europeans.</p>
<p>Having light skin was actually an evolutionary advantage for these Neanderthals. It meant that the individuals who had light skin and red hair were capable of absorbing more <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vitamin_D">vitamin D</a> from sunlight. In Europe, where there are clouds the majority of the time, this would have been a distinct advantage.</p>
<p>Other discoveries have been made that are changing scientists’ beliefs about Neanderthals. They were originally believed to have only rudimentary speech. Scientists and archaeologists have long thought that Neanderthals had a vocabulary of only about 70 words and that their speech was likely very guttural. New research is beginning to show that that may not have been the case. It is now theorized that Neanderthals may have had a much more sophisticated language than was originally thought. </p>
<p><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/image1.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="A perforated shell that was painted with mineral pigments" border="0" alt="image" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/image_thumb1.png" width="229" height="229" /></a>Archaeologists have also found painted shells in Spain that prove that Neanderthals created artwork, something that experts did not think they did. The painted shells were a form of body art or jewelry. Similar shells had been found in Africa and in the Near East and dated from 70,000 to 120,000 years ago. When they were found, they were attributed to our ancestors and not to members of the Neanderthal species. Scientists and archaeologists are now thinking that jewelry that was believed to have been created by Cro-Magnon man may have been created by Neanderthals instead.</p>
<p>The shells were painted with traces of mineral pigments. In some cases, tools used to paint the shells were found as well. There was no proof that the items had been painted at random as there were no traces of pigments found on other items such as food or other stone tools.</p>
<p>Not only was it obvious that the painting of the items was deliberate, some of the mineral pigments came from a distance away. This meant that they needed to be transported to the new area specifically for the purpose of creating artwork. Some shells were used as paint cups and others were decorated for use as body art or jewelry. </p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/06/neanderthal-last-stand-may-have-been-later-than-scientists-believed/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Neanderthal &ldquo;Last Stand&rdquo; may have been later than Scientists believed</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2010/11/22/are-hobbits-alive-and-well-and-living-in-indonesia/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Are Hobbits alive and well and living in Indonesia?</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/04/ancient-carving-found-near-florida-has-been-authenticated/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Ancient carving found near Florida has been authenticated</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/08/08/gene-for-red-hair-may-be-older-than-you-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relationship between Dogs and Men may be older than suspected</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/27/relationship-between-dogs-and-men-may-be-older-than-suspected/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/27/relationship-between-dogs-and-men-may-be-older-than-suspected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/27/relationship-between-dogs-and-men-may-be-older-than-suspected/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists have begun to think that the relationship between dogs and humans may actually go back much further than they originally believed. Early humans domesticated dogs because they needed help herding animals as well as hunting them. They also provided an excellent alarm system and could be used as a food source in a pinch. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image18.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The Eurasian Wolf" border="0" alt="image" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image_thumb18.png" width="196" height="191" /></a>Scientists have begun to think that the relationship between dogs and humans may actually go back much further than they originally believed. Early humans domesticated dogs because they needed help herding animals as well as hunting them. They also provided an excellent alarm system and could be used as a food source in a pinch. Dogs enjoyed staying with humans because of the shelter and food that early man provided. Early dogs were still very much pack animals and enjoyed the companionship that early humans also provided.</p>
<p>In the past, scientists believed that humans and dogs paired up approximately 10,000 to 20,000 years ago. They used clues found in archaeological records in order to make this estimation. This was the time just before the practice of agriculture became a part of the lives of early humans. In the beginning, dogs were tamed wolves that were then interbred for specific characteristics. Some of the earliest dog fossils show this transition from wolf to dog. Examples of bones which show this change include those found at Chauvet Cave in France and Mezhirich in the Ukraine. </p>
<p>Now there is some proof that wolf bones that were found with human bones may have been dogs in their earliest stages. Because they were not bred for specific characteristics until much later it is possible that the wolf bones could have been those of domesticated dogs as the DNA would not have changed overly much in early days. Scientists now believe that dogs may have been domesticated in some form as far back as 100,000 years ago.</p>
<p>Scientists have been able to pinpoint what some of the earliest dog breeds are as well. The genetic structure of these dogs shows the least amount of change from wolf genes although some of the breeds are surprising. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_dog_breeds">Fourteen ancient dog breeds</a> have been identified. They are: the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basenji">Basenji</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shar_Pei">Shar Pei</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiba_Inu">Shiba Inu</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chow_Chow">Chow Chow,</a> the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akita_Inu">Akita Inu</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberian_Husky">Siberian Husky</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaskan_Malamute">Alaskan Malamute,</a> the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_Hound">Afghan Hound</a> and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saluki">Saluki</a>. The Saluki, in particular, is one of the oldest breeds. There are images of dogs which resemble salukis in Egyptian tombs dating as far back as 2134 BCE. They also appear on Sumerian carvings which hdate from between 7000 and 6000 BCE. Salukis are also connected to the Bible and to ancient China as well. </p>
<p>Scientists have also been able to determine that some dog breeds that were previously believed to be very old are actually more modern. These included the Pharaoh Hound, the Norwegian Elkhound and the Ibizan Hound. It is thought that these breeds were created in an attempt to recreate much older breeds that existed at one time.</p>
<p>It is believed that early dogs travelled to North America via the land bridge and likely <a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image19.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="An Australian dingo" border="0" alt="image" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image_thumb19.png" width="244" height="132" /></a>accompanied early humans as domesticated creatures. Some of these became wild dogs that have traits that are remarkably similar to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingo">dingos</a> and other ancient canines. These traits include a medium build, a face that is vaguely foxlike, ears that are large and upright and a tail that is crooked.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2007/07/14/talk-about-an-old-dog%e2%80%a6ca-6000-bc-%e2%80%93-present/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Talk About an Old Dog…(ca. 6000 BC – present)</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/29/ancient-egypt-not-a-great-place-to-be-a-dog/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Ancient Egypt- Not a Great Place to be a Dog</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2007/04/02/origins-of-canine-companionship-ca-12000-bc-onward/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Origins of Canine Companionship (ca. 12,000 BC &#8211; onward)</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/27/relationship-between-dogs-and-men-may-be-older-than-suspected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Humans Lack Body Hair to avoid Parasites?</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/13/do-humans-lack-body-hair-to-avoid-parasites/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/13/do-humans-lack-body-hair-to-avoid-parasites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/13/do-humans-lack-body-hair-to-avoid-parasites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A theory has been put forth that humans lack body hair in an attempt to reduce the number of parasites that affect us. There are many parasites such as ticks, fleas and lice that actually prefer to make their home in coats of deep fur. Humans lack body hair which makes us unique among primates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A theory has been put forth that humans lack body hair in an attempt to reduce the number of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasite">parasites</a> that affect us. There are many parasites such as ticks, fleas and lice that actually prefer to make their home in coats of deep fur. Humans lack <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_hair">body hair</a> which makes us unique among primates and in a category shared only by a few semi-aquatic species of animals such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippopotamus">hippopotamuses</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolphin">dolphins</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whales">whales</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image14.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="A body louse" border="0" alt="image" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image_thumb14.png" width="143" height="196" /></a>The study was developed by a behavioral <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecologist">ecologist</a> and an evolutionary biologist. It basically states that because ancient humans were able to use fire, wear fire and construct shelters they no longer needed the thick coats of fur that early humanoids may have had. The hair on humans still exists in many areas but it has become so fine that it no longer works for heat regulation and no longer can support colonies of annoying parasites.</p>
<p>There are differences in body hair between men and women and the authors of the study say this supports their theory as well. It was believed that hairlessness became a desirable trait in mates and this may have been one reason why women have less body hair than men. A desirable mate was one which was less susceptible to parasitic infestation and being hairless advertised that an individual did indeed possess this desirable trait. It also explained why head and facial hair continued to be so thick. Humans use facial and head hair (or a lack of it) as a way of determining physical attractiveness in a mate. By retaining head and facial hair, this method of determining sexual attractiveness would not have been lost.</p>
<p>In the past, scientists thought that we abandoned our fur coat as a way of surviving in hot environments such as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Africa">African</a> savanna. Scientists have accepted this theory even though other primates who lived in the same environment did not lose their hair coats like humans did.</p>
<p>It was also believed that the change in our fur coat came when we left the trees and <a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image15.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="A head louse" border="0" alt="image" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/image_thumb15.png" width="244" height="167" /></a>began to dwell on the ground. A third theory stated that we lost our hair coat when we became semi-aquatic approximately 8 million years ago. At that time, humanoids began to swim and to immerse themselves in water. It was not surprising that we would adopt the same kind of thin hair coat that other aquatic mammals had.</p>
<p>Humans were still plagued by parasites even after they became hairless. A number of parasites such as body lice continued to affect early humanoids. They tended to live in the clothing and bedding that humans used on a regular basis. It was much easier to change clothing or bedding than it would have been for humans to get rid of parasites living in a thick coat of hair or fur.</p>
<p>While this theory seems to explain many of the reasons why humans would have lost their body hair it has not totally been proven as fact. Scientists would need to compare the amounts of body hair that populations have against the number of parasites that plague that population. That way they may be able to tell whether humans lost their hair to keep parasites at bay. </p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/11/lice-and-humans-an-ancient-and-itchy-history/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Lice and Humans- An Ancient (and Itchy) History</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/03/ancient-brain-unearthed-in-britain/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Ancient Brain Unearthed in Britain</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/06/neanderthal-last-stand-may-have-been-later-than-scientists-believed/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Neanderthal &ldquo;Last Stand&rdquo; may have been later than Scientists believed</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/13/do-humans-lack-body-hair-to-avoid-parasites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fossil Gap Partially Bridged by Buck Toothed Dinosaur</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/15/fossil-gap-partially-bridged-by-buck-toothed-dinosaur/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/15/fossil-gap-partially-bridged-by-buck-toothed-dinosaur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/15/fossil-gap-partially-bridged-by-buck-toothed-dinosaur/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the problems with studying dinosaurs is that there are large gaps in the fossil record. This makes it difficult to tell where some of the dinosaurs evolved from. Scientists make guesses based on factors such as bone shape and tooth shape. They may find out later that two dinosaurs may be totally unrelated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the problems with studying dinosaurs is that there are large gaps in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil">fossil</a> record. This makes it difficult to tell where some of <a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image4.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="A rendering of Daemonosaurus " border="0" alt="This creature was first discovered in New Mexico" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image_thumb4.png" width="244" height="155" /></a>the dinosaurs evolved from. Scientists make guesses based on factors such as bone shape and tooth shape. They may find out later that two dinosaurs may be totally unrelated even though they may look the same in many ways. Or, as in the case of the brontosaurus, they may have ended up renaming a dinosaur that already had a name.</p>
<p>Now, scientists may need to do a little rethinking as one of the fossil gaps has been closed a little. It is now possible to connect a dinosaur such as <i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrannosaurus">Tyrannosaurus rex</a> </i>with some of the earliest predators. When you think about how ornery the T-rex was, it is no surprise that early predators would have been similarly nasty. The T-rex was quite an evolved predator for the time (between 67 to 65.5 million years ago) so when you think that these creatures were related to an extremely advanced predator it is no wonder that they were so effective at hunting and bringing down their prey.</p>
<p>Paleontologists who were working at the Ghost Ranch fossil site in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Mexico">New Mexico</a> found the fossils and named the creature <i>Daemonosaurus chauliodus </i>which, appropriately enough, is Greek for “buck-toothed evil spirit”. It was named this for the buck teeth that the creature sported. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemonosaurus">Daemonosaurus</a> was about the size of a large dog in height. The shape of the skull and the kind of teeth that filled it were quite unusual. The front teeth were extremely large, giving rise to the “buck-toothed” nickname. The snout was quite deep and short which scientists have said is unusual for a predator living at the time. </p>
<p>It is not the only buck-toothed dinosaur to have been discovered. A second species of dinosaur was found in China. Called <i>Incisivosaurus gauthieri </i>because of its beaver-like front teeth, this dinosaur was small and extremely quick. It was found to be one of the first oviraptorosaur species and shows that this species of dinosaur was once herbivorous. Although they belong to a group of dinosaurs called theropods (which are carnivorous), it was apparent that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incisivosaurus">Incisivosaurus</a> was actually a plant eater. The skeleton, which was discovered in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liaoning">Liaoning Province</a> in northeastern China has been found to be approximately 128 million years old.</p>
<p>Scientists are still trying to piece together the fossils that have been found into one<a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image5.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="A diagram of the skull of Incisivosaurus" border="0" alt="The skull of this dinosaur was first found in China" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image_thumb5.png" width="244" height="171" /></a> continuous fossil record. There are many large gaps and it can be difficult to see how changes came about over time. Sometimes the gaps are caused by a total lack of fossils or because earlier testing techniques may have failed to show a connection. Many times scientists are working with only a partial set of fossils from prehistoric creatures, making it difficult to check areas such as skull and tooth shape.</p>
<p>Scientists are also trying to definitively prove where dinosaurs first lived. The best records show that they likely began life in South America. Fossils in that area have been found from as early as the late <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triassic_period">Triassic period</a>, which was about 230 million years ago.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/14/ancient-predatory-shrimp-fossil-found-in-morocco/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Ancient Predatory Shrimp Fossil found in Morocco</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/02/remains-of-massive-prehistoric-snake-discovered-in-columbia/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Remains of Massive Prehistoric Snake Discovered in Columbia</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/06/jellyfish-stinging-swimmers-for-505-million-years/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Jellyfish- Stinging Swimmers for 505 Million Years</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/15/fossil-gap-partially-bridged-by-buck-toothed-dinosaur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ancient Predatory Shrimp Fossil found in Morocco</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/14/ancient-predatory-shrimp-fossil-found-in-morocco/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/14/ancient-predatory-shrimp-fossil-found-in-morocco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/14/ancient-predatory-shrimp-fossil-found-in-morocco/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When someone thinks about shrimp they usually think about cocktails and skewers made up of small pink bodies. Now, a fossil belonging to a prehistoric ancestor of modern crustaceans has been found in southeastern Morocco. At just over three feet in length, it is a full foot longer than previous specimens. Experts believe that this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image2.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="An anomalocaridid" border="0" alt="These predators grew up to three feet in length" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image_thumb2.png" width="244" height="184" /></a>When someone thinks about shrimp they usually think about cocktails and skewers made up of small pink bodies. Now, a fossil belonging to a prehistoric ancestor of modern <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crustacean">crustaceans</a> has been found in southeastern <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morocco">Morocco</a>. At just over three feet in length, it is a full foot longer than previous specimens. Experts believe that this creature was edible and that it would have produced enough meat to feed a large group of individuals for a month. This is certainly not a creature that could be hung on the side of a glass and then dipped in sauce.</p>
<p>The massive prehistoric creature is called an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomalocaridid">anomalocaridid</a>. The name actually means “strange <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrimp">shrimp</a>” due to the fact that they look much like a shrimp or a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuttlefish">cuttlefish</a>. Their remains are usually found with fossils that date from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambrian">Cambrian</a> period (542 million to 488.3 million years BCE) and these specimens usually max out at around two feet in length. This new specimen, which was discovered in rock from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordovician">Ordovician</a> period (488 million to 443 million years BCE), is not only younger than previous specimens it is also a full foot longer. </p>
<p>It was believed that this massive creature was actually a predator and that it likely dominated the waters where it lived. The creatures had many of the features that modern shrimp do, including a similar body shape and two appendages that extended out from the mouth area. They were able to swim freely thanks to swimming lobes located along each side of the body. This made them extremely agile swimmers.</p>
<p>The creatures were thought to live on hard-shelled creatures such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilobite">trilobites</a> and that <a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image3.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="A trilobite" border="0" alt="These creatures were often eaten by anomalocaridids" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/image_thumb3.png" width="224" height="196" /></a>they had developed a ring shaped mouth full of sharp, hard teeth in order to do so. They also had large eyes which enabled them to see their prey.</p>
<p>This discovery raises a lot of questions and issues for scientists who are studying the Cambrian and the Ordovician eras. They want to know whether other animals also grew larger than the fossil records would indicate. The fact that the anomalocaridid was a full foot longer than previous specimens suggested that other animals from the same time might also have been somewhat larger as well. </p>
<p>The discovery of the fossil in the Ordovician period is causing scientists to also rethink when these creatures might have lived. Originally, it was believed that these creatures were not present in rock dating from before about 510 million years CE although there are many examples that have been found in Cambrian-era rocks. </p>
<p>The problem with finding anomalocaridid fossils is that they had soft bodies. This means that there was little remaining to become fossilized the way the bones and exoskeletons of other creatures could be. It took a sediment cloud to protect and preserve these fossils to preserve these anomalocaridids enough that they could be studied.</p>
<p>Anomalocaridids did eventually become extinct although not as soon as scientists had first thought. Although they look like modern shrimp there is no relationship between shrimp and anomalocaridids.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/06/jellyfish-stinging-swimmers-for-505-million-years/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Jellyfish- Stinging Swimmers for 505 Million Years</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/02/remains-of-massive-prehistoric-snake-discovered-in-columbia/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Remains of Massive Prehistoric Snake Discovered in Columbia</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/15/fossil-gap-partially-bridged-by-buck-toothed-dinosaur/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Fossil Gap Partially Bridged by Buck Toothed Dinosaur</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/14/ancient-predatory-shrimp-fossil-found-in-morocco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re back on Monday!</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/11/were-back-on-monday/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/11/were-back-on-monday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 19:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regular posts will be resuming on Monday, thanks for reading! Related Posts:North American Burial Mounds- Remnants of a Sophisticated SocietyRudolph the Red-Nosed Entrée (ca. 24,000 BC)The Double-Sided Faces of Boa (ca. 8th C AD)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular posts will be resuming on Monday, thanks for reading!</p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/03/18/north-american-burial-mounds-remnants-of-a-sophisticated-society/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">North American Burial Mounds- Remnants of a Sophisticated Society</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2007/12/27/rudolph-the-red-nosed-entree-ca-24000-bc/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Rudolph the Red-Nosed Entrée (ca. 24,000 BC)</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2007/05/12/the-double-sided-faces-of-boa-ca-8th-c-ad/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Double-Sided Faces of Boa (ca. 8th C AD)</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/11/were-back-on-monday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sweet History of Honey</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/16/the-sweet-history-of-honey/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/16/the-sweet-history-of-honey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 14:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/16/the-sweet-history-of-honey/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When archaeologists opened an 18th Dynasty Egyptian tomb in the Valley of the Kings, they made a startling discovery. There, amid furniture, vehicles and other funerary artifacts they discovered vessels full of honey. It had crystallized but was still edible. Honey that was over three thousand years old was not only still in the tomb [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When archaeologists opened an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighteenth_dynasty_of_Egypt">18<sup>th</sup> Dynasty</a> Egyptian tomb in the Valley of the Kings, they made a startling discovery. There, amid furniture, vehicles and other funerary artifacts they discovered vessels full of honey. It had crystallized but was still edible. Honey that was over three thousand years old was not only still in the tomb it was still edible and had not spoiled in any way.</p>
<p><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/image20.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Hieroglyphs of honey bees and wasps" border="0" alt="Honey was important to the Ancient Egyptians" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/image_thumb20.png" width="244" height="164" /></a>Honey was used in many different ways by the ancient Egyptians. As well as being used as a natural sweetener for baked goods and other food, it was also a component in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mummy">mummification</a> process used by the Egyptians to preserve their dead. Honey was also a part of the religious life of ancient Egypt. It was used as an offering to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Min_%28god%29">Min</a>, an Egyptian god of fertility.</p>
<p>Honey was also used in other cultures besides the ancient Egyptians. People have been searching for this natural sweetener for at least ten thousand years. Cave paintings that were discovered in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valencian_Community">Valencia</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spain">Spain</a> showed the process of collecting honey. In the painting, two women are collecting both honey and honeycombs from the nests of wild bees. The painting has been dated to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesolithic">Mesolithic</a> period.</p>
<p>While many cultures simply looked for honey in the nests of wild bees, the ancient Chinese actually developed beekeeping. It has been mentioned in texts dating from the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_and_Autumn_Period">Spring and Autumn period</a> which lasted from 771 BCE to 453 BCE. In the books, which were written by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_Li">Fan Li</a>, tips for keeping bees successfully were mentioned. Fan Li, an advisor living in the Chinese state of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yue_%28state%29">Yue</a>, stated that the quality of the wooden box used to house the bees was important. He stated that it could affect the quality of the honey that the bees produced.</p>
<p>Honey was used as more than just a sweetening agent or as a food. It was put on wounds by Roman legions as a way to speed up the healing process. Honey contains natural antibacterial properties that can help prevent infection so it was no wonder that it would be used for healing. Even now, many ointments and skin creams contain honey because of its healing properties. Honey was also used to treat skin rashes and burns for the same reason. In Mesoamerica, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stingless_bee#Mayan_stingless_bees_of_Central_America">stingless honey bees</a> have been revered by the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_peoples">Mayan</a> people for thousands of years. They considered the bees to be a sacred animal and cultivated them, a practice which has continued to the present day. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_Bible"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Laotian painting of Buddha and the monkey" border="0" alt="According to legend, a monkey brought Buddha honey while he lived in the wilderness" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/image21.png" width="224" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>Honey has also appeared in many different ancient religious texts including the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_Bible">Hebrew Bible</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Testament">New Testament</a> and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qur%27an">Qur’an</a>. In Buddhism, honey plays a major role in some religious festivals. One in particular, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhu_Purnima">Madhu Purnima</a>, celebrates the retreat of Buddha into the wilderness as a way of making peace among his various disciples. During this retreat, religious legends state that a monkey brought honey to Buddha so that he could eat. The gift that the monkey brought is one that is common to many pieces of Buddhist art. </p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2007/09/15/beehives-in-the-land-of-milk-and-honey-ca-900-bc/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Beehives in the Land of Milk and Honey (ca. 900 BC)</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/20/hear-no-evil-see-no-evil-advice-from-17th-century-monkeys-still-popular-today/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Hear No Evil, See No Evil- Advice from 17th Century Monkeys Still Popular Today</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2010/12/08/ancient-cosmetics-the-beautiful-killer/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Ancient Cosmetics- The Beautiful Killer</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/16/the-sweet-history-of-honey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lice and Humans- An Ancient (and Itchy) History</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/11/lice-and-humans-an-ancient-and-itchy-history/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/11/lice-and-humans-an-ancient-and-itchy-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 14:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/11/lice-and-humans-an-ancient-and-itchy-history/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first encounter that most people have with lice is when they get a call from their child’s school. They find that their son or daughter is being sent home with a head full of bugs or eggs. The process of combing through hair and treating the scalp will begin. It can be an uncomfortable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first encounter that most people have with lice is when they get a call from their child’s school. They find that their son or daughter is being sent home with a head full of bugs or eggs. The process of combing through hair and treating the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalp">scalp</a> will begin. It can be an uncomfortable and embarrassing situation for everyone.</p>
<p><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/image14.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Combing out the hair to remove head lice" border="0" alt="This Bugbuster comb removes lice from the hair shaft" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/image_thumb14.png" width="224" height="129" /></a>What they may not realize is that head lice are not the only kind of lice that infest humans. They may also not realize that several discoveries about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pediculosis_capitis">head lice</a> and body lice have taught us many things about evolutionary history and even the migratory journeys that early humans took part in. </p>
<p>Lice are small, wingless insects that feed off of the blood of their host. They tend to stick to one type of host. For example, the lice that are found on apes, monkeys or other animals would not make their home on a human and vice versa. Lice fall into two main groups: those that chew on their hosts to get blood, and those that suck blood from their hosts. The lice that live on humans are of the sucking rather than the chewing variety.</p>
<p>The lice that live on humans can be further divided into three varieties. The most common is the head louse, which is the plague of school children and their parents in many countries. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_lice">Body lice</a> live on body hair and in the folds of clothing. They are also quite common and tend to flourish where people are living in crowded conditions. The third type is known as crab lice and these live in the genital region of humans. They are spread from one human to another through sexual contact.</p>
<p>It is believed that lice first split into chewing and sucking varieties between 100 and 145 <a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/image15.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="An enlarged image of a body louse" border="0" alt="Body lice live in clothing and feed on blood" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/image_thumb15.png" width="178" height="244" /></a>million years ago. The chewing lice made up the largest group. Sucking lice only have about 500 species including the species that make the lives of human hosts miserable. Further testing showed that head lice found on humans separated from the head lice that are found on chimpanzees about 5.6 million years ago. Using that evidence as well as human DNA evidence, it was possible to prove that human and chimpanzee ancestors also split from one another at the same time.</p>
<p>Head lice are not the only lice that have helped scientists find out more about early humans. For example, scientists who have studied body lice have been able to tell that the invention of clothing only happened about 107,000 years ago. Lice need a place where they can live and breed in between feeding off of the blood of their hosts. Humans do not have enough body hair to support body lice and so body lice evolved to live in clothing. Since they did not exist before about 107,000 years ago, it shows that clothing appeared around the same amount of time.</p>
<p>Although lice continue to plague humans throughout the world they have been useful in helping scientists determine many facts about the lives of ancient humans and how they evolved over time.</p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/07/13/do-humans-lack-body-hair-to-avoid-parasites/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Do Humans Lack Body Hair to avoid Parasites?</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2007/08/29/nitpicking-soldiers-in-ancient-rome-72-73-ad/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Nitpicking Soldiers in Ancient Rome (72-73 AD)</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2010/11/17/english-sweating-sickness-the-killer-with-no-known-cause/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">English Sweating Sickness- The Killer with no known cause</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/11/lice-and-humans-an-ancient-and-itchy-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crucifixion: The Truth behind Hollywood Movie Depictions</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/22/crucifixion-the-truth-behind-hollywood-movie-depictions/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/22/crucifixion-the-truth-behind-hollywood-movie-depictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/22/crucifixion-the-truth-behind-hollywood-movie-depictions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crucifixion was believed to be one of the worst punishments that a person could endure. It was not a fast death nor was it one of the more pleasant ways that someone could die. Many people think that the Romans were the only people to crucify their enemies and that a person was always nailed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion">Crucifixion</a> was believed to be one of the worst punishments that a person could endure. It was not a fast death nor was it one of the more pleasant ways that someone could die. Many people think that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Rome">Romans</a> were the only people to crucify their enemies and that a person was always nailed to the cross but this was not always the case. So why was it so unpleasant and how did the actual practice differ from what you see in the movies?</p>
<p>Imagine that you are a prisoner in the ancient Middle East. It was not the best place to commit a crime. If you were caught stealing, you got your hand lopped off. There were other rather nasty punishments for other unlawful undertakings as well. But, at least they were fairly quick and, if you were lucky, you could recover and continue on with your life. Not with crucifixion. </p>
<p><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/image19.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Bust of Emperor Nero" border="0" alt="Roman emperor who thought crucified individuals made good nightlights" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/image_thumb18.png" width="184" height="244" /></a>You would be dragged out and tied to a large wooden cross. Wood was a good thing as far as the Roman Emperor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nero">Nero</a> was concerned because it burned well as many early Christians discovered. Nero had a particular love for crucifying the Christians he caught and setting them alight in order to provide Roman streets with illumination. Not the cheeriest of streetlights, but it certainly did send a strong message to other Christians: keep your head low and your mouth shut.</p>
<p>Even if you were not about to be used for outdoor lighting, crucifixion was unpleasant. There was a lot of very warm sun in the Middle East and crucified individuals were simply left out in the elements until they died. They were not given food or water, and the strain on their arms was terrible. If you were nailed to the cross (which was done when the Romans really wanted to make a point), you would have had the nails driven in through your wrists and feet. Often, you were also completely naked, since the Romans wanted to make the experience as humiliating as possible. Finally, victims would simply die. On many occasions, their bodies remained up on display even after death had occurred.</p>
<p>The Romans were not the only ancient people who thought that this was a great way to <a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/image20.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The Orpheos Bakkikos Crucifixion" border="0" alt="Ancient seal depicting crucifixion" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/image_thumb19.png" width="156" height="244" /></a>deal with criminals and political prisoners. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carthaginians">Carthaginians</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macedonians_%28ethnic_group%29">Macedonians</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achaemenid_Persia">Persians</a> also used this method of punishment and execution. In Carthage, it was a regular method of execution and was even something that was used on generals who had lost major battles. Some rulers such as Alexander the Great were known for crucifying large numbers of prisoners or enemy soldiers as well. </p>
<p>While crucifixion was used by many ancient cultures, there were some that relied on other methods of punishment. The Greeks tended to avoid crucifying their own people although they didn’t hesitate to execute a Persian general named <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artayctes">Artayctes</a> who was captured during the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Persian_invasion_of_Greece">second Persian invasion of Greece</a>. </p>
<p>Over time, the Romans moved away from crucifixion and began using other methods of executing prisoners. In fact, it was abolished completely in 337 CE by the Emperor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_I">Constantine I</a>, otherwise known as Constantine the Great. </p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/01/28/the-great-fire-of-rome/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">The Great Fire of&hellip; Rome?</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/06/16/locusta-romes-professional-poisoner/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Locusta- Rome&rsquo;s Professional Poisoner</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/13/historic-roman-military-losses-the-battle-of-adrianople/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Historic Roman Military Losses- The Battle of Adrianople</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/22/crucifixion-the-truth-behind-hollywood-movie-depictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Praying for the Departed on Easter- The Thursday of the Dead</title>
		<link>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/20/praying-for-the-departed-on-easter-the-thursday-of-the-dead/</link>
		<comments>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/20/praying-for-the-departed-on-easter-the-thursday-of-the-dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Scribe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ancient World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/20/praying-for-the-departed-on-easter-the-thursday-of-the-dead/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One ancient custom that is still celebrated in the Middle East is Thursday of the Dead. It is an Arabic celebration that is observed by both Muslims and Arabic Christians. The holiday is normally celebrated on the Thursday before the Easter weekend. In other countries, the same day is known as Maundy Thursday or Holy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One ancient custom that is still celebrated in the Middle East is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thursday_of_the_Dead">Thursday of the Dead</a>. It is an Arabic celebration that is observed by both Muslims and Arabic Christians. The holiday is normally celebrated on the Thursday before the Easter weekend. In other countries, the same day is known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Thursday">Maundy Thursday</a> or Holy Thursday. </p>
<p>Although the two celebrations fall on the same day, they are quite different. Thursday of the Dead is traditionally a day when the souls of the dead are honored. This is accomplished by visiting local cemeteries. They reach the cemeteries before dawn and pray there. After, they distribute dried fruit and special bread cakes or rolls to children, their relatives and the poor in the area. </p>
<p>There are different traditions depending on which Middle Eastern countries you happen to<a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/image17.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: right; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Saladin" border="0" alt="A drawing of Saladin who may have started the Thursday of the Dead" align="right" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/image_thumb16.png" width="189" height="244" /></a> be in. In Jerusalem, the women carry dyed eggs with them and visit cemeteries in the afternoon instead of before dawn. In Syria, women living in Homs, a city, tend to purchase sweets and hand these out to the poor and to children as well. There, the celebration is known as “Thursday of Sweetness” instead of by its traditional name.</p>
<p>It is believed that the celebration may have dated back to the Middle East during the twelfth century although it may be older than that. Tradition states that it may have been started when <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saladin">Saladin</a>, a Muslim leader who lived from 1138 CE to 1193 CE, began trying to foster understanding and tolerance between the Muslims and non-Muslims who were living in the region.</p>
<p>In contrast to the Thursday of the Dead, which is celebrated in the morning or early in the day, Maundy Thursday or Holy Thursday usually is celebrated in the evening. This is because this celebration commemorates the Last Supper shared between Jesus Christ and his Apostles. It is celebrated both by Orthodox Christians and other Christians as well. </p>
<p><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/image18.png"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: left; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="The Washing of The Feet" border="0" alt="A 16th century image showing foot washing" align="left" src="http://ancientstandard.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/image_thumb17.png" width="185" height="244" /></a>The events that are traditionally held on this day usually include the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_washing">Washing of the Feet</a>, an ancient rite of hospitality and humility. It was mentioned in the Bible and has been practiced by many other ancient cultures as well. At the Last Supper, Jesus washed the feet of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve_apostles#The_Twelve_Apostles">twelve apostles</a> before they all dined together. There are also special masses said in church and often communion is also taken on this day as well.</p>
<p>In England, it became a custom for the monarchs to hand out money on Maundy Thursday. In earlier times, one penny per year of the Sovereign’s age was handed out but now <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maundy_money#Maundy_coinage">Maundy money</a> is used in the place of other coins. The monarchs were also known to wash the feet of commoners as well. In Malta, the tradition is to visit a series of seven churches. In other countries, candy and easter eggs are handed out or colored and individuals prepare for the upcoming holiday.</p>
<p>While both Thursday of the Dead and Maundy Thursday are still being celebrated, the celebrations have changed somewhat since their earliest days. </p>
<div id="crp_related"><br><br><h3>Related Posts:</h3><ul class="post"><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/01/poisson-davril-the-history-of-april-fools-day/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Poisson d&rsquo;Avril- The History of April Fool&rsquo;s Day</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/18/painted-eggs-and-chocolate-rabbits-the-ancient-meaning-behind-modern-easter-symbols/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Painted Eggs and Chocolate Rabbits- The Ancient Meaning behind Modern Easter Symbols</a></li><li><a href="http://ancientstandard.com/2011/05/05/cinco-de-mayo-and-other-mexican-celebrations/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Cinqo de Mayo and other Mexican Celebrations</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ancientstandard.com/2011/04/20/praying-for-the-departed-on-easter-the-thursday-of-the-dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

